Category Archives: Rants

That’s a Shame

Earlier today I tried to download a demo for a program designed to help youth ministers manage their ministries. The program tells ministers that their software will help them track attendance, events, money, birthdays and help them follow up with visitors.

Sounds promising.

So I registered with their website and clicked download. OOOPS! The program is PC only.

I run a Mac. So do a few other youth ministers.

“No big deal,” I thought. I’ve gotten by thus far without this product so I moved on with my day.

Seriously, not 5 minutes later my phone rings. It is customer service with this program. They were wanting to chat me up about their product. I informed them that I was unable to run their program because I don’t have a PC.

The following is a direct quote from their customer service lady (best read with the voice of the secretary from “Ferris Bueller”)

“Oh, you don’t have a PC? That’s a shame!”

No, no it’s not.

No what is a shame is that the instructions on your CD-rom from 2007 tell people to:

Click Start.
Click Run.
In the run dialog box, type (CD drive letter):Setup
Then Enter.

Wow. Ever heard of Autorun? That’s a shame!

Merging Questions

Yesterday, XM and Sirius, the two and only two satellite radio companies, announced their plans to merge the two outfits into one $13 billion dollar company. While the press release assures shareholders that it will be a win-win situation (XM Shareholders will receive 4.6 shares of SIRIUS for each share of XM they own) the press release answers very little of the questions that the typical consumer of satellite radio might have at this point.

Guess what: I’m a typical satellite radio consumer and I have some questions.

Three years ago, I decided that I really wanted to get a satellite radio. We were living in an area of the country that was, um, let’s say, lacking in terrestrial radio choices. In fact, they were terrible. The city we were in had weak signals and it was difficult to find nationally syndicated shows that we enjoyed listening to. So I went about learning everything I could about Sirius and XM Radio.

In the end, I chose XM over Sirius.

I liked the XM exclusive content like MLB (Sirius has NFL), Talk Radio, as well as XM Confidential and I liked the XM playlists for their music channels. At the time XM had a great selection of receivers than Sirius. However now both companies offer a greater number of high quality and visually pleasing receivers. Finally, the decision came down to usability. I found XM to be the most user friendly satellite radio company out there. I purchased a receiver and was up and running in a matter of minutes.

I enjoy my XM radio very, very much. I love listening to the Starbucks channel, Glen Beck, Theme Time Radio Hour with Bob Dylan, Deep Tracks, Buried Treasure with Tom Petty and The Message CCM channel. Every one of those programs and channels are exclusive to XM. Am I going to lose my favorite channels and shows because of this merger? I feel a little confident that I might get to keep my channels because it seems that XM will absorb Sirius. XM closed at $15.50 yesterday while Sirius closed at $3.93. XM has been that more financially sound of the two.

The press release did not speak to this but only created more questions.

Greater Programming and Content Choices — The combined company is committed to consumer choice, including offering consumers the ability to pick and choose the channels and content they want on a more a la carte basis.

Ug. This sounds like I’ll have to pick and choose my channels and content. It also sounds like there will be a price structure on a sliding scale instead of one flat fee. Satellite radio will be the new cable television. Great.

Accelerated Technological Innovation — The merger will enable the combined company to develop and introduce a wider range of lower cost, easy-to-use, and multi-functional devices through efficiencies in chip set and radio design and procurement. Such innovation is essential to remaining competitive in the consumer electronics-driven world of audio entertainment.

Will the player that I have now be able to connect with the new company or will I have to purchase a new, more expensive reciever with this new “chip set?” My cynical side already knows the answer to this question.

Enhanced Financial Performance — This transaction will enhance the long-term financial success of satellite radio by allowing the combined company to better manage its costs through sales and marketing and subscriber acquisition efficiencies, satellite fleet synergies, combined R&D and other benefits from economies of scale. Wall Street equit analysts have published estimates of the present value of cost synergies ranging from $3 billion to $7 billion.

More Competitive Audio Entertainment Provider — The combination of an enhanced programming lineup with improved technology, distribution and financials will better position satellite radio to compete for consumers’ attention and entertainment dollars against a host of products and services in the highly competitive and rapidly evolving audio entertainment marketplace. In addition to existing competition from free “over-the-air” AM and FM radio as well as iPods and mobile phone streaming, satellite radio will face new challenges from the rapid growth of HD Radio, Internet radio and next generation wireless technologies.

This is merely a positive short term analysis. Without competition economic growth will slow and customer care will wane. Look back at cable television. You can argue that cable tv faces opposition from movie theaters, DVD, satellite tv, as well as iPods, computers, and game consoles. Yet, rather than meet these challenges head on with great programing, awesome customer service, and revolutionary technology cable tv providers treat consumers with no respect. They act as electronic Don Corleones making us lose-lose offers that we can’t refuse. They control content and only allow us a peak at it with high costs and sliding price structures that change at their whim.

I hate having to chose channels and wade through my cable bill. I’m afraid that the fate of satellite radio will closely resemble this antiquated enterprise.

Of course all of this merger business will be in the hands of the SEC. They are not big fans of consolidation so the merger isn’t a lock by any stretch of the imagination.

I just hope that I won’t lose one of my favorite gadgets. If I do, I guess that I’ll just have an extra 13 dollars a month. That and a receiver that will stand as a monument to a great invention that was marred by corporate greed and bad ideas.

More On Jesus Camp

I am at a loss for words really. However there is one thought that is consuming me.

Shame on everyone involved- the film makers, the camp directors, the adults, the producers, the parents.

You are all guilty of exploiting those children for profit and power.

For shame!

Just a Plain Old Bible Cover

Why can’t I find a regular, nondescript cover for my Bible anywhere?

I’ve found plenty of neon colored covers. And I’ve seen my fair share of covers that have an eagle airbrushed on them. I’ve noticed covers that look like footballs and I almost bought a cover that came with a compass just in case God’s Word failed to point me in the direction true north. Look at these descriptions of popular covers:

Nylon construction with two compartments, organizing features including CD organizer, credit card organizer, note pad, interior cell phone and PDA pocket, and pen pockets.

Best-seller made even better! Features: *Organizational flap with more interior pockets, credit card and CD/DVD storage *Pen pockets *Notepad holder *Durable construction

Who is carrying their credit cards in their Bibles? Who wants to carry around their DVDs in their Bible? Who are these people that need to carry all that junk with them while they read God’s Word? At the most you need a pen, a highlighter, and some paper. At most.

The other thing that has bugged me while looking for a bible cover is the fact that they all have a handle or handles. Do you really need handles? My study Bible has 2469 pages in it yet I can comfortably hold it in one hand without the use of handles. It’s a Bible, not a purse.

I have found that there are hundreds of covers that try and outshine what they are carrying but there are almost zero covers that just protect Bibles from the elements. That’s all I’m looking for.

I’m not looking for a cover that has bumper sticker theology embroidered on the front in some religious font with a Icthus zipper. I just want to protect my Bible from some of the wear and tear that come from reading and living with it. That’s all. No more, no less.

Are You Willing to Make The Hard Changes Now?

From Seth Godin’s Small is the New Big:

My first job was cleaning the grease off the hot-dog roaster at the carousel snack bar, near my home in Buffalo. Actually, it wasn’t a roaster. It was more a series of nails that rotated under a lightbulb. I also had to make the coffee and scrub the place clean every night. it very quickly became obvious to me that I didn’t have much of a future in food service.

I didn’t have to make many decisions in my job. And the manager of the store didn’t exactly look to me to initiate change. In fact, she didn’t want anyone to initiate change. (My suggestion that we branch out into frozen yogurt fell on deaf ears, as did my plea that it would be a lot cheaper to boil hot dogs on demand than to keep them on the rack under the lightbulb all day.)

Any change, any innovation, any risk at all would lead to some sort of terrible outcome for her, she believed.

After I set a record by breaking three coffee carafes in one shift, my food-service career was over. I was out on the street, unemployed at the tender age of 16. But from that first job, I learned a lot — and those lessons keep getting reinforced.

Just about every day, I go to a meeting where I meet my boss from the snack bar. Okay, it’s not really her. But it’s someone just like her: a corporate middle-person who’s desperately trying to reconcile the status quo with a passionate desire to survive. My boss didn’t want to jeopardize her job. She viewed every day and every interaction not as an opportunity but as a threat — a threat not to the company but to her own well-being. If she had a mantra, it was “Don’t blow it.”

In her business, she faced two choices: to die by the guillotine, a horrible but quick death, or to perish slowly on the rack — which is just as painful a way to go, if not more so, and guaranteed to leave you every bit as dead. But in her nightmares, only one of those two options loomed large — the guillotine.

I have to admit it. I have the same dream.

Have you ever spent a night worrying about what your boss (or your stockbroker or a big customer) is going to say to you at that meeting the next morning? Have you ever worried about some impending moment of doom? That’s fear of the guillotine.

But almost no one worries about the rack. We don’t quake in our boots about a layoff that’s going to happen two years from now if we don’t migrate our systems before our competition does. We’re not afraid of stagnating and dying slowly. No, we’re more afraid of sudden death, even though the guillotine is probably a far better way to die.

Recently, at the invitation of the president of a company, I visited its operation in Chicago. This company is a household name, a financial-services giant. And its people know that the Internet represents a huge threat to their future.

When I get there, people are so earnest. They’ve all done their homework. They all take notes and ask questions. At first, it seems as if they’re doing everything right to prepare for the future. They’ve got an Internet task force, and it reports directly to the president. It’s a high-profile gig: Lots of senior people are on this team, and virtually every department in the company has a representative on it.

The team is busy hiring consultants, building prototypes, creating business models, and generally working hard to get the company in shape for the next century.

I give my talk, and team members invite me to sit in on a presentation by the company’s top marketing person. We sit down in a huge conference room, with a fantastic view of the lake, a silver tea set on a sideboard, and custom-printed yellow pads placed in front of everyone.

After the presentation — which sounds all too much like state-of-the-art Internet strategy circa 1996 — they ask me what I think.

I look around, and that’s when I realize that every single person in the room is waiting for me to say the same thing. They want to hear, “Hey, you guys are totally prepared for the Net. Don’t worry about it.” They want to hear, “Hey, this Web thing isn’t a threat to your business model. You don’t need to change a thing.” They want to be told that everything will be fine.

And the really sad and amazing thing is that they don’t care if I’m wrong. The idea that their company could end up like Waldenbooks or CBS or Sears or any other big, dumb company is just fine — as long as they don’t have to change now.

What was going on here? I had just met a group of smart, aggressive, well-compensated people, who control billions of dollars in assets and one of the best brand names in the world. Yet they knew they were going to fail, and they couldn’t do a thing about it. They had all bought into a system in which it’s just fine to fail on the big stuff — as long as little failures don’t happen now.

Let’s be honest.

Nobody likes change.

Real change, earth-shattering change, stay-up-all-night-worrying change isn’t fun. At most companies, it’s a huge threat, an opportunity for failure, a chance to see the stock plummet, to watch divisions get axed, to hear customers scream and yell. We’re organized to resist big change at every turn.

The problem is that today we don’t have a choice. We can’t leave innovation to the small guys, the startups that have nothing to lose. Either we change our businesses, or they die.

Resisting change is natural, sometimes even healthy. In today’s world, though, it can be deadly.

Businesses that don’t change disappear. Winners change; losers don’t.

At the Carousel Snack Bar, I learned three lessons that are just as valid now, 23 years later, as they were then. The first is that you should never take a job that requires you to bring your own grease rag to work. Second, jobs in which you don’t initiate change are never as challenging, fun, or well paid as those in which you do. And third, companies that don’t change vanish.

It’s easy to see those lessons at work on the Net, but change isn’t just about the Internet. When the Internet is old news, companies still will be turning over. Remember DeSoto and Pierce-Arrow and Dusenberg and Packard and American Motors? How about Borland and Spinnaker Software and Ashton-Tate and (almost) Apple? Or A&M Records? Or Orion Pictures?

In the long run, we’re all dead. The same is true for companies, divisions, and brands. Sooner or later, the place where you work is going to disappear. You’re not safe, no matter where you are. Your company is going to fail or be acquired or acquire another company, and you’ll lose your job. Or you’ll lose interest in your job.

One way or another, sooner or later, you’re going to leave. So why not take some risks along the way? Here’s the question: Are you going to be a change agent, or are you going to keep bringing your own grease rag to work?

The biggest gripe that I hear from folks at companies with two or more employees is that someone else in their company is impeding change, that “they” don’t get it, won’t endorse it, won’t allow it to happen. If you’re one of the folks offering up one of those excuses, I’ve got news for you: What you’re looking for isn’t change. What you’re looking for is an official endorsement of the risk-free status quo.

It’s possible to have a great corporate career, to make a difference, to add significant value to your company. But the best way to do that is to instigate and execute change, to risk your job on a nearly constant basis — because every job risk enhances your career.

Imagine that you’re on a boat. It’s a big boat, and it’s got a leak. Actually, it’s got a hole. Belowdecks, your colleagues are busy bailing: They’ve got cans and hoses and even a pump, and they’re bailing water as fast as they can. The optimists in the group are pointing out that no one has drowned yet, and that maybe a giant piece of kelp will come along and get stuck in the hole and plug it up.

Up on the deck, senior management is saying, “Full speed ahead.” Sure, every once in a while a vice president notices that the ship isn’t quite as high in the water as it was. And the rest can’t help noticing that many of the boats around them are sinking. But, frankly, they’ve got a pretty good gig, and all of the alternatives that they can think of involve getting wet.

And there, about 50 feet away, is a brand-new boat, a boat with no leaks, no holes. And nobody’s on it. So here’s the question: Why not go for it?

Big-company CEOs almost never complain to me about employees who take too many risks. They almost never whine about a workforce that’s busy with new initiatives at the expense of the core business. And they don’t complain when people stand up and fight for ideas, standards, and quality that they absolutely believe in. But they almost always talk about people who play it too safe, who avoid risks, and who are dooming their company to mediocrity and, ultimately, death.

What are you going to do? Risk the sharks in the water, get your brand-new Lacoste shirt wet, and go for a swim? Or grab a can and start bailing, even though you know this baby’s going under? What will it be? The guillotine or the rack?

By the way, the last time I visited my parents in Buffalo, I drove by the Carousel Snack Bar. It’s closed — bankrupt, I think. And I bet that spending those last few years on the rack was no fun at all.

Seth Godin (sgodin@fastcompany.com) is the author of “Permission Marketing: Turning Strangers into Friends, and Friends into Customers” (Simon & Schuster, 1999).

In my life I have had the opportunity to work for men and women who were willing to do the hard thing. They traded present security in order to make changes that had the potential to secure the future. Win or lose the organizition was better for it. We worked harder and with greater enthusiasm because we knew that we were standing on the edge of greatness. When we were faced with failure we stood together and quickly rallied with a new idea or perspective to keep us on track. There is no greater feeling.

Conversely, I have worked with my fair share of people who simply try and avoid the guillotine not realizing that they have resigned themselves, their organization, employees, and shareholders to an aggonzing, slow death on the rack of irrelevance.

What about you? Anybody out there want to work for someone that simply avoids the hard stuff?

Not me. I am willing to make the hard changes. I’ll start by making the changes within myself.

link

Burn!

Nothing gets me as riled up as bad music. Well, I take that back. Nothing gets me as riled up as bad music that is passed off as great music.

Exhibit A:
Yesterday I posted the K-Fed video. What a nightmare! There are hundreds of bands who are out there working hard and paying their dues making music that is real, positive, and revolutionary and this yahoo marries a pop princess and gets prime-time airspace to destroy my ear drum with his drivel? What’s that about?

Exhibit B:
Yesterday, MTV Hits dedicated the entire day to P.Diddy’s fake band Danity Kane because their album dropped today. Art and Corporations don’t work together. Ever. Period.

Oh yeah, Exhibit B2 would be that Paris’ “album” dropped today as well.

Exhibit C:
Fergie’s London Bridge
Danity Kane’s Show Stopper
Justin’s SexyBack
The Pussycat Doll’s Buttons
Nelly Furtado’s Promiscuious

All crap songs. All chart dominators.

Well today fellow readers, I stand in great company. Not only am I tired of the junk pumping from America’s speakers but the father of modern music is too.

Who am I? I’m a nobody consumer who spends a great deal of time with my iPod.

Who is the father of modern music? Bob Dylan

Bob Dylan says the quality of modern recordings is “atrocious,” and even the songs on his new album sounded much better in the studio than on disc.”I don’t know anybody who’s made a record that sounds decent in the past 20 years, really,” the 65-year-old rocker said in an interview with Rolling Stone magazine. Dylan, who released eight studio albums in the past two decades, returns with his first recording in five years, “Modern Times,” next Tuesday. Noting the music industry’s complaints that illegal downloading means people are getting their music for free, he said, “Well, why not? It ain’t worth nothing anyway.”

“You listen to these modern records, they’re atrocious, they have sound all over them,” he added. “There’s no definition of nothing, no vocal, no nothing, just like … static.”

Don’t trick yourself into believing that Bob is just some old coot who is pining away for the good old days. He would be the first to tell you that the old days weren’t that good (socially).

No, Mr. Dylan is just a man who has seen a lot of musicians and heard a lot of music that is disposable. He’s tired of.

When will America get tired of it?

link

As It Stands Today, Microsoft Wins

I believe that a death blow was dealt yesterday in the battle between Microsoft and Sony for hearts, minds, and opposable thumbs of the world’s gaming community. Microsoft came out hard last holiday season weilding its brand new weapon, XBOX 360. Sony faltered and delayed the release of the much anticipated Playstation 3 until later this year. Sony had been the clear champion with the PS2 and was poised to again soundly trumb the XBOX with their upcoming console.

That is until yesterday when Sony came out and cut its own head off.

Sony Computer Entertainment’s PlayStation 3 will be the most expensive game system on the market when it debuts Nov. 17 in North America.

The much anticipated video game console will sell for $499 for a system that has a 20-gigabyte hard drive or $599 for a system with three times the storage, the company said at a news conference Monday night. Microsoft Corp.’s Xbox 360 starts at $299.

I will tell you what I am not. I am not a gaming expert. I will never have a show on G4 and I will never win any awards for my gaming abilities.

However, I am a male, age 18-34, who derives a good deal of pleasure from playing video games during some of my free time. I am your average video game player. I was born during the heyday of the arcade, played Pitfall with my dad on our Atari, grew up with my little grey friend the NES, played too much Goldeneye in college, got married and fell in love with my PS2.

The Playstation 3’s price point is astronomically high. Let’s say you buy the basic PS3 and one game. You are out $560. That’s without tax. I live in a city that has a 10% sales tax. That would bring the price for a basic system and one game to $616. I think I threw up in my mouth a little.

I predict that come this November, Microsoft will drop the price of the XBOX 360 for holiday shoppers and the battle will be over. Even something as small as a $50 dollar price cut would entice more mothers and fathers to choose the XBOX over the PS3.

Sony, you priced yourselves right out of the game.

link